articleonrocks.com articleonrocks.com articleonrocks.com
  Main :> About Us :> Place Your Link :> Privacy Policy :> ToS :> Add Article
Search:   
Get Free Links
 

Science & Research

 

Society & Communities

 

Fashion & Lifestyle

 

Health & Hygiene

 

Property & Agents

 

Automotive

 

Banking & Finance

 

Online Shopping

 

Government & Politics

 

Self Help

 

Travel & Accommodation

 

Academics & Education

 

Healthcare & Treatment

 

Children

 

Sports

 

Culture & Art

 

News & Media

 

Indoor Games

 

Home & Garden

 

Companies & Business

 

Cooking & Drinking

 

Careers & Employment

 

Computers & Networking

 

Recreation

 
 

Main › Companies & Business › Leadership & Supervision
 

Hidden Consultants Within Your Organization

 

Youve all heard the old joke about a consultant being someone who uses your watch to tell you the time, and then steals your watch. Theres some truth to the story: consultant recommendations are often the same things that your employees or customers have been telling you all along. But while you will listen to a consultant, you dont listen to your employees and customers. Why is that? Why do companies pay more attention to consultants then they do to employees or customers? And what should you do about it? But lets start with an even more important question: why should you listen to employees and customers?

Why listen?
The best reason for listening to employees and customers is that they have a detailed understanding of your company's problems. They're close to day-to-day operations so they see what's happening and what's wrong. When you implement their ideas theyre committed to success because of their personal involvement. The result is a fast implementation of change, with a high probability of success.

So why dont companies listen to employees and customers? Based on my own experience, here are the primary reasons why companies dont take advantage of their hidden consultants:

No Clear Summarization
First, we dont hear recommendations from employees and customers in a clear summarized way. We interact so much with these people that the recommendations arent separated out from everyday comments. A profound statement is dropped casually into a conversation on another subject, and we miss the importance of the statement.

When I'm working as a consultant doing interviews with employees and customers, I often hear significant statements, but I notice them because Im listening for them. My brain is focused on gathering important information, and so Im able to separate out the irrelevant stuff from the important things. Most people dont listen that way on a day-to-day basis.

Then, after Ive heard an important statement and verified it with others, Ill figure out the best way to convey the statement to my client. Sometimes the issue with accepting a recommendation isnt so much the recommendation itself; its how the recommendation is presented. Important truths have to be presented in a way that makes the client see the light without taking offense. Employees and customers don't often use appropriate summarization and presentation techniques, and so we reject their recommendations.

Bias
Second, we think employee and customer opinions are biased and therefore unreliable. We think they are trying to advance their own personal agendas. For example, an employee just wants to do that project because it would make his job bigger. Or a customer wants us to improve our service because she wont take responsibility for problems in her own company. Sometimes personal bias will color an opinion, but we dont take the time to sort out the motivations and get to the truth of the matter. Instead, we just tune out the employee and customer comments, throwing out valid suggestions because we think the source is biased.

Reluctance
Third, we have made it pretty clear to employees and customers that we don't want their advice, and as a result, they are reluctant to offer it. They see us criticize ideas and shoot them down, and they see us label idea creators as rabble-rousers and troublemakers. In such an unsupportive environment, they have determined that its best to keep their heads down and their ideas to themselves.

Other reasons
Here are some other reasons Ive run across:

Some managers dont want to acknowledge that their own employees can be more knowledgeable about a subject than the managers are. The managers forget that the employees (a) are usually closer to everyday problems, and (b) have had a life before working for this manager, and so they have other experience to bring to the table.

Managers sometimes feel that giving an employee a strong say in an issue will be viewed as giving up control. We forget that we arent in control anyway. At best were leading and steering, and certainly were accountable, but the employees who do the work actually have control over the processnot the managers.

Theres a feeling of you get what you pay for, so we feel that a low-paid employee cant provide as good an opinion as a high-paid consultant. This is a narrow viewpoint, but it feeds the families of many consultants.

How to use your hidden consultants
So what can you do to take advantage of these hidden consulting talents? Here are some suggestions:

1. Help your hidden consultants learn how to focus. Provide training for your employees and customers in techniques that help them find the root cause of a problem, determine possible solutions, and put together a plan to solve the problem.

2. Provide a way to get feedback from employees without you being biased by the source of the feedback. Create a method for employees to submit suggestions and ideas anonymously, but with a way to subsequently identify the suggester if you want to provide a reward.

3. Identify someone (internally or externally) who is good at summarizing and presenting. Have that person summarize employee and customer feedback and present it in the way that an outside consultant would.

4. Have a program in which selected employees can be consultants for a week. Having these employees think like consultants takes them outside the day-to-day process, if only temporarily, and gives the employees the opportunity to identify issues and recommend solutions. Sometimes this approach is even more effective if the employees act as consultants for different departments than their own.

5. Help your employees to learn how to differentiate between a reason (why you are a certain way) and an excuse (why you stay that way). And make sure that you understand the difference yourself.

Conclusion
I make my living as a consultant, so I obviously dont want you to stop using my services. But ultimately my goal is to help companies be more profitable and become better places to work, and most companies are missing a huge opportunity for self-improvement. By taking advantage of the ideas generated by your own employees and customers, and by focusing those ideas on providing benefit to your business, you can reserve the use of outside consultants for the things were best at:

Providing skills and expertise that dont exist within your organization, and

Helping your organization develop better processes for optimizing your own skills and expertise.

You have a huge pool of hidden consulting talent within your organization. You just have to focus it and use it.

2004 MakingITclear, Inc. This article was originally published in the June, 2004 issue of the MakingITclear Newsletter, a free monthly email newsletter published by MakingITclear, Inc. MakingITclear is a registered trademark of MakingITclear, Inc.

Author: Harwell Thrasher
 
Author Bio:

Harwell Thrasher

Harwell Thrasher is an author, speaker and strategist who sometimes describes himself as a "jiggler" because he helps stuck companies. Harwell founded MakingITclear, Inc. in 2002 after thirty years of experience in Information Technology.

Harwell specializes in improving IT effectiveness by helping IT and non-IT people understand each other's issues and needs. He?s been a speaker at Microsoft?s CIO Summit, at the University of Georgia Executive MBA program, and for meetings of various technical and non-technical societies.

As Vice-President of Technology Architecture & Strategy at Ceridian Corporation, Harwell performed technology due diligence for over twenty prospective Ceridian acquisitions in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and Switzerland, and helped the acquired companies integrate their IT strategy with the strategy of the parent company. Harwell?s experience at Ceridian included a number of business process reengineering efforts. He led a major effort to automate a financial services business, and he led the creation of Ceridian?s first Internet payroll product.

Prior to Ceridian, Harwell worked at the headquarters for Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), where he developed and managed MRP (Material Requirements Planning) systems for DEC's 29 manufacturing plants around the world, and then moved on to become MIS Manager for DEC's U.S. Field Service.

A graduate of M.I.T.'s Sloan School of Management, Harwell is an Atlanta native.

 
 
 

Related Articles

 
5 Steps to Sales Success
 
Corporate Relocation Incentives
 
How to Build a Viable Network Marketing Business
 
MLM??s that deliver on a very important dream.
 
Scams and Spam Are Alive and Well
 
Importing Goods from China? Learn How to Use Sales Financing
 
Permission Email Marketing Tips for Offline Small Business Owners
 
Factors Influencing the Impact of Humor in Persuasion
 
Tune Your Piano of Persuasion
 
Sales Training Tips for Car Washes
 
 
 
Main :> Privacy Policy :> ToS  
© www.articleonrocks.com - All Rights Reserved Worldwide